Jump to content

Mickey's Twice Upon a Christmas: Difference between revisions

DMnimations (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Copied|Awful Movies Wiki on the Wayback Machine}}[[File:MTUAC.png.png|thumb|Walt Disney Pictures had a rough transition into CGI.]]
heartwarming story that anyone can enjoy. This film feels like a watered-down and a lamer version of that.
 
 
'''Mickey's Twice Upon A Christmas''' is a 2004 computer-animated direct-to-video Christmas comedy and is a sequel to Mickey's Once Upon a Christmas. The segments in this video feature Mickey Mouse, Minnie Mouse, Pluto, Goofy, Max, Donald Duck, Daisy Duck, Huey, Dewey, and Louie, and Scrooge McDuck in five different segments. Along with Mickey's PhilharMagic theme park attraction, this production was one of the first to depict the Mickey Mouse series characters in CGI animation.
 
== Bad Qualities ==
 
# To write down the first problem, it is often considered a cash-in sequel from a mile away, all because of its presentation. Considering that it is one of the many not-so-good direct-to-DVD movies DisneyToon Studios has been turning out in the 2000s, especially since the 2000s was a rough time for Disney. This one is exceptionally the CGI embodiment of this.
#* It fails to retell charming Christmas stories that the previous film, ''Mickey's Once Upon a Christmas,'' did right. Where that movie told a simple, corny yet sweet, emotional, and heartwarming story that anyone can enjoy. This film feels like a watered-down and a lamer version of that.
# Where ''Mickey's Once Upon a Christmas'' had three stories to share. Despite this film having five stories to tell, it feels like it has about 10 stories because of how much there are so many plots that are thrown into each other, whether if they make sense or not.
# Where ''Mickey's Once Upon a Christmas'' had three stories to share. Despite this film having five stories to tell, it feels like it has about 10 stories because of how much there are so many plots that are thrown into each other, whether if they make sense or not.
#* It goes to the point of overload where the motivations for each story don't feel like they connect with each other. Especially when the title has '''Mickey''' on the cover, yet Mickey only shows up in the first and last segment of the story that doesn't focus on him ironically enough.
#* It goes to the point of overload where the motivations for each story don't feel like they connect with each other. Especially when the title has '''Mickey''' on the cover, yet Mickey only shows up in the first and last segment of the story that doesn't focus on him ironically enough.